TRANSFORMING SYSTEMS BY MAKING COERCIVE CONTROL VISIBLE
End Coercive Control Blog
Exploring the Quicksand Model® and More:
Insights from the End Coercive Control USA Blog
Dive into the End Coercive Control USA Blog to explore the groundbreaking Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control and gain valuable insights into the patterns and impacts of coercive control and domestic abuse. This blog serves as a vital resource for survivors, advocates, and professionals, offering in-depth articles, expert perspectives, and actionable strategies to combat coercive control. From understanding the intricacies of the Quicksand Model® to uncovering tools for education and prevention, the blog provides knowledge to empower individuals and inspire change.

Understanding The Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control
The Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control is a groundbreaking training program designed to make the often invisible tactics of coercive control visible and understandable. This model synthesizes 70 years of research and theory across various fields, including domestic abuse, human trafficking, cults, extremism, and trauma, to provide professionals with the tools needed to detect, intervene in, and prevent coercive control. Key Aspects of the Quicksand Model 1. Evidence-Based Synthesis The Quicksand Model® is an evidence-based model that integrates research from multiple disciplines, including neuroscience, psychology, sociology, and human rights. This comprehensive approach ensures that the model addresses the complex and multifaceted nature of coercive control. 2. Training for Professionals The model is designed to quickly train professionals to recognize and address coercive control, which is often

Could criminalizing coercive control further harm female victims?
In response to the question “Could criminalizing coercive control further harm female victims?” the concise answer is a resounding yes. This concern is frequently voiced by global domestic violence organizations when survivors seek legislative changes to outlaw coercive control. While this apprehension is valid, it’s worth noting that from the 1970s onwards, as domestic violence laws began to take shape across the United States, we’ve often witnessed the unintended fallout of laws designed to safeguard victims. Various regulations, such as mandatory reporting and mandatory arrest laws, protective order procedures, supervised visitation and child support policies, among others, have been manipulated by coercive controllers. This manipulation allows them to inflict additional harm on their intended victims. This misuse extends to various other legal frameworks, policies, and procedural norms as well. In my view, the potential

Is coercive control intentional?
Coercive controllers are the puppeteers of manipulation! Every strategy they employ against their chosen victims at the start of the “relationship” to fabricate The Mirage, is also utilized on friends, family, and anyone within their surrounding circle. The implementation of these coercive control tactics usually intensifies when their main target begins to comprehend the abuse. However, there’s no doubt, the coercive controller has likely been practicing manipulation and deceit from the get-go. Cunning coercive controllers understand that no one relishes the experience of abuse, and when their control over their primary target strengthens, this person may begin to resist the abusive behaviors causing them harm and/or distress. As a result, they often introduce the Double Team strategy early on, in an attempt to thwart any possible escape plans

Coercive Control Research Study Opportunity
This research study on coercive control is being conducted by Kacey Baker, a master’s student in the psychology of coercive control program at the University of Salford. If you have been targeted by coercive control, please consider participating. Here are the important details: I am a researcher from The University of Salford conducting a study titled Investigating the potentiality of an “Extent of Coercive Control Universal Scale” – an exploratory study as part of my master’s programme dissertation in the Psychology of Coercive Control (supervised by Dr Rod Dubrow-Marshall). The purpose of this study is to develop and validate the ‘Extent of Coercive Control Universal Scale,’ a tool designed to assess experiences of coercive control in different environments such as domestic situations, workplaces, cults, and

What are the signs of coercive control?
Coercive control is a complex, nuanced, and dangerous pattern of abuses of power. It is the pattern of behavior that establishes and maintains oppression, and it is often said to be invisible in plain sight. In order to be able to see the signs of coercive control, we need to understand the biological, psychological, and social forces that are keeping coercive control invisible. In today’s blog post, I’ll be discussing the initial trio of signs that constitute The Mirage™ in coercive control. Recognizing these preliminary indicators may not prevent you from being targeted, but it could potentially help you from becoming ensnared, and eventually entrapped, in the bio-psycho-social quicksand of a coercive controller. The Quicksand Model® of Coercive Control has been meticulously crafted to expose the

Context is King in Cases of Coercive Control & Domestic Violence
Commencing prior to 1970, the battered women’s movement, spearheaded by survivors and driven by aspirations to diminish domestic violence and safeguard women seeking refuge, initially framed domestic violence through a lens that persists in law enforcement and the legal system today. This lens, known as the violent incident model, continues to shape perceptions and responses to domestic violence. The violent incident model proves to be especially inadequate when applied to the intricate and nuanced patterns of behavior characteristic of domestic abuse, domestic violence, and coercive control. Why? Because relying solely on this lens to evaluate cases, particularly those involving coercive control, is akin to judging a book solely by its cover. By focusing solely on individual incidents, the most crucial elements of the pattern—the context—are overlooked, thereby

Victim or Victim Mentality? The Karpman Triangle & Coercive Control
Have you ever found yourself unjustly shouldering the blame for the actions of your coercive controller? Victim-blaming is a pervasive issue, particularly in cases involving coercive control. Unveiling the invisible nature of coercive control is crucial to understanding this phenomenon. Despite its prevalence, coercive control remains unnoticed in plain sight. Imagine a scenario where evidence is abundantly available, easily identifiable for those in the know, yet elusive to those unaware of its existence – a hidden reality right before our eyes. Let’s explore the reasons behind victim-blaming, demystify the covert nature of coercive control, and empower ourselves with knowledge to break free from its insidious grasp. In this discussion, I’ll explore the Karpman Triangle, a well-known model for understanding dysfunction in relationships. We’ll delve into how

Consent & Coercive Control
Coercive control laws are being proposed and passed around the world. Laws that define coercive and controlling behaviors began in the UK, and Australia, Scotland, Canada and the US are taking steps to address coercive control in criminal and/or civil legislation. But coercive control legislation is moving slowly, and I believe one big reason for that is not that we haven’t defined what coercive control IS, but that we have not defined what it is NOT. You see, at it’s most basic, coercive control is a pattern of behaviors that violate another person’s autonomy. It is a pattern of abuses of power. When one person ignores another person’s right to their own thoughts, feelings and behaviors, in order to control or dominate them, that IS coercive control. And definitions of coercive control